Jun 7, 2013

Larry Hancock Talks About November In Dallas

Larry Hancock talks about the Lancer Conference this November in Dallas, Texas.......



On the next point, actually I do think there is a solid 30 second take away and even a sound byte – “Senior CIA officers let certain keIn regard to Dallas, the JFK Lancer conference will be a key vehicle not only to connect with a great number of the most experienced researchers on the case but to have a considerable amount of personal time with them. In addition to four days of presentations (the schedule runs from 8 am to 9 pm each day) a number of focus group sessions where you have the chance to engage in a small group discussion on various topics. For myself I will be moderating focus groups on the cover up and on the Cuban exile aspect of the conspiracy. If you have not been in Dallas before, there will be separate tours that you could take, lead by a real expert on not only Dallas but the physical and people aspects of Nov. 22, 1963 – Jerry Dealey will be leading those tours and he is a Dallas historical docent plus one of the major gurus on both physical nature of the plaza and of tLarryhe TSBD. In addition to that both Jerry and I will be leading walking tours of the plaza area on Sunday.
In regard to your other points, it is pretty obvious that for various reasons the Kennedy family chose not to engage in the investigation, at least publicly, and their control of various pieces of evidence has been a serious hindrance – as a co

Larry Hancock

Larry Hancock is a leading historian-researcher in the JFK assassination. Co-author with Connie Kritzberg of November Patriots and author of the 2003 research analysis publication titled also Someone Would Have Talked. In addition, Hancock has published several document collections addressing the 112th Army Intelligence Group, John Martino, and Richard Case Nagell. In 2000, Hancock received the prestigious Mary Ferrell New Frontier Award for the contribution of new evidence in the Kennedy assassination case. In 2001, he was also awarded the Mary Ferrell Legacy Award for his contributions of documents released under the JFK Act.First thank you for the re-posting and for your kind remarks…both are much app

Larry Hancockreciated!!unter, there is some reason to believe that Bobby specifically may have held certain information and even material in the hope of becoming president and moving into a position to order a true investigation. That was never going to happen withFirst thank you for the re-posting and for your kind remarks…both are much appreciated!! Johnson in power, for reasons I discuss in SWHT. So, from my perspective, the whole Kennedy family track is simply something to set aside – the fact that we have a document showing Bobby actually signing for a full autopsy nIn regard to Dallas, the JFK Lancer conference will be a key vehicle not only to connect with a great number of the most experienced researchers on the case but to have a considerable amount of personal time with them. In addition to four days of presentations (the schedule runs from 8 am to 9 pm each day) a number of focus group sessions where you have the chance to engage in a small group discussion on various topics. For myself I will be moderating focus groups on the cover up and on the Cuban exile aspect of the conspiracy. If you have not been in Dallas before, there will be separate tours that you could take, lead by a real expert on not only Dallas but the physical and people aspects of Nov. 22, 1963 – Jerry Dealey will be leading those tours and he is a Dallas historical docent plus one of the major gurus on both physical nature of the plaza and of the TSBD. In addition to that both Jerry and I will be leading walking tours of the plaza area on Sunday.egates a lot of speculation. Bottom line, the family could have done a lot more but then that could be said of a lot of people in positions of political power who knew there was a lot more to the story than a lone nut.y individuals involved in thIn regard to your other points, it is pretty obvious that for various reasons the Kennedy family chose not to engage in the investigation, at least publicly, and their control of various pieces of evidence has been a serious hindrance – as a counter, there is some reason to believe that Bobby specifically may have held certain information and even material in the hope of becoming president and moving into a position to order a true investigation. That was never going to happen with Johnson in power, for reasons I discuss in SWHT. So, from my perspective, the whole Kennedy family track is simply something to set aside – the fact that we have a document showing Bobby actually signing for a full autopsy negates a lot of speculation. Bottom line, the family could have done a lot more but then that could be said of a lot of people in positions of political power who knew there was a lot more to the story than a lone nut.e anti Castro effort know that JFK was entering into negotiations with Castro about taking Cuba neutral, those officers passed the information to extremely militant Cuban exiles who were already trying to kill Castro along with the message that JFK was a national security threat and a traitor to the Cuban exile cause…the result was the attack in Dallas.” The attack had three goals, revenge on JFK for the Bay of Pigs, elimination of him as a threat to a revolution against Castro and thirdly a plan to frame Castro for the attack. The first two elements worked, the third aborted when Oswald was taken into custody. Now that’s easy for me to say, but it takes over 400 pages in SWHT aOn the next point, actually I do think there is a solid 30 second take away and even a sound byte – “Senior CIA officers let certain key individuals involved in the anti Castro effort know that JFK was entering into negotiations with Castro about taking Cuba neutral, those officers passed the information to extremely militant Cuban exiles who were already trying to kill Castro along with the message that JFK was a national security threat and a traitor to the Cuban exile cause…the result was the attack in Dallas.” The attack had three goals, revenge on JFK for the Bay of Pigs, elimination of him as a threat to a revolution against Castro and thirdly a plan to frame Castro for the attack. The first two elements worked, the third aborted when Oswald was taken into custody. Now that’s easy for me to say, but it takes over 400 pages in SWHT and another couple of hundred in NEXUS to present the case for that conclusion.nd another couple of hundred in NEXUS to present the case for that conclusion.
Bottom line, will we ever know all tactical details of the Dallas attack, the answer is not with any total certainty – although a bit more of that may come clear this November. Will we know why JFK was killed and generally who was behind it, the answer is that I believe we do but its a matter of circumstantial evidence and sources. Could you win a criminal trial, probably not, a civil trial, most likBottom line, will we ever know all tactical details of the Dallas attack, the answer is not with any total certainty – although a bit more of that may come clear this November. Will we know why JFK was killed and generally who was behind it, the answer is that I believe we do but its a matter of circumstantial evidence and sources. Could you win a criminal trial, probably not, a civil trial, most likely. And in terms of the cover up, we could absolutely present sufficient evidence of that as well as perjury and obfuscation to convince any group of 12 random individuals.ely. And in terms of the cover up, we could absolutely present sufficient evidence of that as well as perjury and obfuscation to convince any group of 12 random individuals.
LoLong winded answer but I hope it helps, we can go further if you wish. Best regards, Larryng win


L


ded answer but I hope it helps, we can go further if you wish. Best regards, Larry