Showing posts with label Abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abortion. Show all posts

Apr 2, 2016

Dear Hillary: On donald trump and Hipocrisy--Will I Be Jailed?

Margaret Sanger Deutsch: Margaret Sanger (* 1879)
Margaret Sanger Deutsch: Margaret Sanger (* 1879) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Dear Hillary,



hy·poc·ri·sy

the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.




On donald trump and his confusing, contradicting message.

Thinking donald trump is a product of and one who has enjoyed the sexual revolution of the sixities and the seventies and women's lib one would wonder why he would want punishment for those who have made an error in birth control regarding this issue.

He promoted a picture of his beautiful wife, Melania and bragged about her photo in GQ--her photo without clothes--one would conclude a photo of a beautiful and lovely woman without clothes, fur blanket to boot, his private jet.....wouldn't this give the viewer and listener a picture of sex, sexual attraction.

Let's use other words--an opportunity for pregnancy.

This picture of Melania suggests he would promote sex out of marriage, the use of birth control, unless he wants the prospect of having children every time anyone acts on the idea of this picture.  One would also think he is in favor of sex outside of marriage by his history of girlfriends separate from his wife--while he was married.

So while he promotes sex and the idea of it for men he also wants the woman to be punished and even serve jail time if they would choose not to have children if a pregnancy ensued.

Just wondering--is donald trump promoting health care, education on birth control or just punishment for women only and as he mentioned, no punishment for the man.

So the man can fool around and be promiscuous, no consequences, no responsibility for birth control, money or raising children but the woman or the health care provider, doctors and nurses can go to jail.

This does not seem right to me.

He is going back to the dark ages.

Then, later as he tried to rectify his stupidity of his words he suggested possibly the woman should not be punished but the workers that participate in the procedure and the facility.


TAB--Therapeutic Abortion or D and C--Dilatation and Curettage is a routine hospital and surgery center procedure.

Yes, it is for termination of pregnancy and the same procedure is used for many reasons such as obtaining specimens.

As a nurse does this mean I would potentially have to face jail time for going to work because one can not always opt out of routine procedures.

Something is not right about his thought process.

It is embarrassing for our country that this individual is running for our leader.

I am afraid of this man who proclaims that no one would have a better ability to provide health care to women than him.

If this is the archaic kind of health care he wants to provide for women let me think about moving to a country with a more modern system.

The man is uninformed--the man needs to get up to speed before he runs for President.

Please keep up the good work with Planned Parenthood and education for women.  I will be voting for you in November.

I do not know if it is possible to educate donald trump.

Related articles

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Dec 9, 2015

Planned Parenthood: Could Bill O'Reilly Influence a Young Lady

Entrance to the Planned Parenthood Federation ...
Entrance to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America headquarters in Washington, D.C. Please note, this is no longer the Planned Parenthood building, this building is now under Brookings Institute. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
English: Washington State Representative Lauri...
English: Washington State Representative Laurie Jinkins at a rally for Planned Parenthood in 2011. Photo courtesy of CarlB104, via Flickr. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Now, just asking the question.


What do you think?



Picture a scared young lady--trying to make a decision--some would say a life decision.

Some would say a decision about health care--women's health care.

It is the choice of the young women--what are this lady's desires and choices for life.

Maybe this is a young girl in college trying to complete her own life dreams or the dreams of her parents.

Maybe it is not the right time for children.

Perhaps the girl is not interested in sharing this information with her parents.

Could the parents be judgemental and beastly--even degrading.

It might be that the girl feels it just is not the business of the parents.

Trying to make a decision--what is right for her.


Enter Bill O'Reilly.........................

Could his nightly hawking on the evils of Planned Parenthood have an influence on our lady?

Given this is a legal situation and having reverence for Bill's own point of view--would he hold sway over anyone in this decision making process?

Just wondering--what is your opinion.......

Related articles

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Dec 5, 2015

Planned Parenthood: It would be nice if Bill O'Reilly would check out these interesting facts about the organization



An expert report submitted to congressional leadership today, concludes
that the secretly recorded and heavily edited videos, released about
Planned Parenthood and life-saving fetal tissue donation ‘significantly
distort and misrepresent’ actual events.
“A thorough review of these videos in consultation with

qualified experts found that they do not present a complete

or accurate record of the events they purport to depict,”
- Glenn Simpson, a partner at the research firm Fusion GPS,

in a 10-page report submitted to leadership of the House and Senate.

Documents

Fusion GPS assembled three teams of experts in video forensics, production, and transcription to review five secretly recorded videotapes of Planned Parenthood staff that have been released as part of a three-year fraud by a group of anti-abortion activists with extremist ties. The experts, which include Grant Fredericks who is a contract instructor of video sciences at the FBI National Academy and one of the most experienced video experts in North America, reviewed the five short videos (of eight to 15 minutes in length) that have been widely reported on and viewed, as well as the longer versions of those videos (which total 12 hours for all five) that were released hours or days later.

Key quotes from the expert report:

“The short videos take a great deal of dialog out of context

so as to substantively and significantly alter the meaning of

the dialog contained in the long videos.”
“CMP edited content out of the alleged “full footage” videos,

and heavily edited the short videos so as to misrepresent

statements made by Planned Parenthood representatives.”
“The short videos significantly distort and misrepresent the

conversations in the full footage. Mr. Fredericks notes that

the short videos contain ‘edited conversations where

some spoken words are eliminated and some spoken words

are added out of content.”
 “At this point, it is impossible to characterize the extent to

which CMP’s undisclosed edits and cuts distort the meaning

of the encounters the videos purport to document. However,

the manipulation of the videos does mean they have no

evidentiary value in a legal context and cannot be relied

upon for any official inquiries unless supplemented by CMP’s

original material and forensic authentication that this material

is supplied in unaltered form.”
Along with the expert report, Planned Parenthood submitted a 
short breakdown of the heavy, deceptive editing in the five videos. 
Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Cecile Richards

said today:
“Our commitment is to get all the facts and share them fully,

and that’s what we’re doing today. We’ve said all along that

these videos were heavily edited to deceive the public, and

that’s what this expert analysis now shows. The more the

public learns about this fraudulent, baseless attack on women’s

health, the better, and that’s why today we’re laying everything

out for leaders in Congress and for the public.”

Key data from the summary:

  • Collectively, the five videotapes of Planned Parenthood staff have 
  • at least 42 splices where content is cut and edited together to 
  • make it appear to be a seamless conversation.
  • In some cases, these splices completely change the meaning 
  • of statements. On one video, a Planned Parenthood staff member’s 
  • remarks about lab protocols were edited to make it sound like she 
  • was talking about changing abortion procedures. Phrases on the tape 
  • were isolated and removed, stringing together unrelated sentences 
  • to change the meaning. 

    Anti-abortion activists used the doctored “quote” to support 
  • false claims that she was talking about changing how an abortion 
  • would be done, and the “quote” was published by mainstream 
  • media as if it were real.
  • On one tape, a Planned Parenthood staff member in Colorado 
  • says 13 separate times that any arrangements related to fetal 
  • tissue donation need to be reviewed by attorneys and follow 
  • all laws – and all 13 are edited out of the video.
  • On another tape, a Planned Parenthood staff member in Texas 
  • says nine separate times that there is no “profit” related to 
  • fetal tissue donation – and all nine are edited out of the video.
The summary of edits and expert report were submitted to Senate and
House leadership with a letter from Planned Parenthood Federation of 
America that provides extensive background and information on our
involvement with fetal tissue research. The letter explains that fetal
tissue research is critical for helping develop cures for serious diseases
and advancing public health.

Planned Parenthood affiliates in 

two states -- 1% of Planned 

Parenthood’s health centers -- 

currently offer tissue donation 

as an option for women who want it.

FetalTissueDonationMap-Aug2015_r2_TW.png
To date, four separate committees in the House and Senate have launched
investigations into Planned Parenthood.

In the last two weeks, 

five 

states have concluded 

investigations into 

Planned 

Parenthood – and 

every one 

of them has found 

no wrongdoing.

Two states – California and Texas – have also called for investigations
into the Center for Medical Progress. Last month, a bill to defund
Planned Parenthood and block millions of women from having
access to health care failed to pass in the U.S. Senate.


copied from the website of Planned Parenthood



from chloelouise:

here is what gets me real angry.........
Bill makes is seem as if Planned Parenthood is doing something
real bad, as if they are bad people doing a disservice to society.
He influences many people, but he might want to know the facts.

Organs are harvested every day and tissue donation takes place
every day in the United States--usually it is looked upon as a good
thing as in the word ...... donation.

My question--how would Bill handle things differently if the
tissue would not be donated--he never really answers that
question.  We know he is against abortion and that is his right
but what would his preferred outcome be for the intended tissue?

Just asking.......

he is not really looking out for the folks on this one--certainly
not the individuals that might want to take advantage of the
services of Planned Parenthood.

Related articles

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Feb 20, 2014

Huffington Posts Martha Burk--A Very Short memo to the GOP

Martha Burk Headshot


Martha Burk Become a fan 
Money Editor, Ms. magazine; director, Corporate Accountability Project, National Council of Women's Organizations

A Very Short Memo to the GOP

Posted: Updated: 
Print Article
To: GOP
From: The little woman and her sisters
Date: 2014-2016 election season
The majority of voters (women) want access to birth control.
The majority of voters (women) want abortion to be legal.
The majority of voters (women) don't think any rape is legitimate.
The majority of older voters (women) rely on Social Security and don't want it cut.
The majority of those on food stamps (women with kids) need the help.
The majority of minimum wage workers (women) want a raise.
The majority of voters (women) think they should be paid the same as men for the same work.
The majority of voters (women) know at least one husband who had a sleazy sexual relationship.
The majority of voters (women) respect the wife for getting through it the best way she could.
The majority of voters (women) don't want a female presidential candidate attacked for something her husband did almost 20 years ago that has nothing to do with her credentials, track record, ability, and yes, ambition.
The majority of voters (guess who?) know that if a man says he wants to win on his own terms he's tough and dedicated, but if a woman says it she's ruthless and bitchy.
Guess why the majority of voters (you guessed right) think your party is waging a war on women.
Follow Martha Burk on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MarthaBurk


from the Huffington Post

Jim B. (Slim_Dude)
  • 3
Each and every statement from Ms. Burk is true. Well written.
11 FEB 3:10 PM
Darla C. (ddecember)
  • 2
The Republicans have done nothing useful for years. When you have nothing to say, you attack the other side. Because your own record is at best blank, the best you can do is try to say well they are worse than us!
12 FEB 5:02 AM
Bart DePalma (Bart_DePalma)
  • 2
"The majority of voters (women) don't want a female presidential candidate attacked for something her husband did almost 20 years ago that has nothing to do with her credentials, track record, ability, and yes, ambition."

How about a female presidential candidate who rode to power as the wife of a sexual predator and worked actively to defend him in order to maintain her own political power?

How about a female presidential candidate who calls the female victims of a sexual predator in the Senate and their female supporters "whiny women" who needed to shut up because the then First Lady needed the Senator's vote for her government health care takeover?

How can the leader of a coalition of so called women's groups support and defend such behavior?
12 FEB 10:58 AM
Barry Goldwater (GoldwaterKid)
    Ms Burk:

    Hillary will have to answer all her questions first during the DNC Primary Election.

    It has nothing to do with the GOP
    11 FEB 7:09 PM
    • ARTICLE AUTHOR
    Martha Burk
    • 1
    If it has nothing to do with the GOP then why is presidential aspirant Rand Paul attacking her along with the head of the RNC, which also bussed people to the so-called March for Life on the mall last month. Wake up!
    12 FEB 11:03 AM
    Lisa Nicholson (mdbmama)
    • 1
    Right on target Martha. Nothing else needed.
    Posted by at No comments:
    Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
    Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)