Showing posts with label Erik Wemple. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Erik Wemple. Show all posts

Dec 5, 2013

Bill O'Reilly: His Christmas Gift to Jon Stewart

Erik Wemple

Jon Stewart of ‘The Daily Show’ rips Bill O’Reilly’s Christmas activism

On his Dec. 2 show, Fox News host Bill O’Reilly vowed to “keep an eye” on the so-called War on Christmas. In what’s clearly a not-too-fruitful search for 2013 war-on-Christmas grist, O’Reilly fixated on Macy’s. “This year they’re touting Santa Claus who will help you, quote, ‘With your holiday wish list,’ ” declared O’Reilly, who would prefer that the department store say “Christmas wish list.” More O’Reilly: “So here is my question to Macy’s. What holiday is Santa celebrating? Winter solstice, the birthday of a reindeer — what?”
And that was plenty enough for Jon Stewart, who used a segment of his “Daily Show” program to poke at the war on the War on Christmas. He appeared a bit fatigued by this quite predictable issue, noting how “we do this dance every year.” When Stewart asked what makes this year particularly noteworthy in the tyranny of “happy holidays,” he turned to O’Reilly’s argument about timing: “What is interesting this year is that Hanukkah will be over on Thursday. So there are no more holidays between then and Christmas Day. It’s just Christmas if you want to invoke happy. Bad news for the secular progressives,” said O’Reilly. Stewart ridiculed the notion.
The back-and-forth between O’Reilly and War-on-Christmas detractors like Stewart is a merry pursuit, a staple of the “holiday” season. Last year a poll by Public Policy Polling found that 47 percent of respondents believed this war existed, as opposed to 40 percent who did not. Thirteen percent fell in the “not sure” category, a demographic that O’Reilly and Stewart have gotten an early start on influencing this year.

Nov 26, 2013

Hey Boys, Mrs. Sarah Palin is Talking Now!


While my politics are opposite of Ms. Palin I support her right to say her opinion Image result for sarah palinin the media just like all of the big mouth men.  Bill, Martin and Chris Matthews are so busy congratulating themselves on their own intellect they fail to realize that Sarah has out smarted them all.  She is a media manager to rival the likes of Princess Diana.  Guess what, boys, you are busy groveling after her and asking for her attention.  Who is in the media now.  Oh, and don't forget the biggest fool of all, Bill Maher.


Talking about Bill O'Reilly complaining to Howie Kurtz that Mrs. Palin will not do his show.....

Chris Matthews, holier than thou, can't get the guts to answer.......



copied from the Washington Post:




Erik Wemple

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews weighs in on Martin Bashir fiasco. Sort of.


Martin Bashir, in 2007 (Nick Ut/Associated Press)
Martin Bashir, in 2007 (Nick Ut/Associated Press)
Put Chris Matthews before a Washington audience, and the guy can riff on a lot of topics. In an appearance yesterday at Barnes & Noble in downtown D.C. to promote his book “Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked,” Matthews talked congressional elections, presidential elections, President Kennedy — not to mention the media. On the topic of Fox News and Rupert Murdoch, the cable host said no one really takes too seriously the “fair and balanced” slogan. However: “They believe it’s balancing the rest of the media. And so there’s a sense among the right — it’s still there — if you’re not on the right, you’re a liberal. So if you look like you’re just sort of reading the news, you’re a liberal, unless you['ve] got their attitude. And so, I think that’s the residue of years and years of liberal domination of the mainstream press, which I think is pretty near an end. … I don’t know where Diane Sawyer’s politics are. I don’t know what Brian Williams’s politics are. Or Scott Pelley’s, if he has any. I don’t know what it is. Tell me if you can tell. I can’t tell. I think [George] Stephanopoulos has played it down the middle.”
Moments later, the Erik Wemple Blog* asked Matthews about this week’s MSNBC-centric media news. Martin Bashir, an afternoon host at MSNBC, apologized on Monday to viewers after having suggested that Sarah Palin be subjected to a cruel treatment once forced upon slaves. Palin had previously compared the burdens of public debt to slavery.
The contrite words of Bashir didn’t diminish calls within the media-critic industry for more accountability from MSNBC’s leadership. So we thought we’d ask Matthews about it all. The back and forth:
EWB: Do you have any comments about the trouble that Martin Bashir got himself in?
Matthews: Not really. I work in that company. I don’t have any comment on it. I can understand that you’d ask the question, but I work for MSNBC.
EWB: Well, it’s just a question, though. I mean, he’s a colleague, he said something. You have opinions. You’d have an opinion if someone else worked at another network…
Matthews: I’m not a media critic.
EWB: Oh, yes you are.
Matthews: No, I’m not…He’s a colleague of mine.
We’ll keep an eye out for the next time Matthews hammers some cowardly politician for closing ranks. The noteworthy aspect of Matthews’ dodge is how unnecessary it is. He could easily proclaim that his colleague’s remarks were wholly unacceptable — that they were neither accurate nor fair. Those were the very terms, after all, that Bashir himself used in his apology.
*(Though we didn’t disclose our affiliation with the Erik Wemple Blog, Matthews was speaking at a public event.)

Jul 10, 2013

Bill O'Reilly The Ugly American Strikes Again.....


copied from the Washington Post............

Bill O’Reilly’s magic black murder statistic



Trayvon Martin
Trayvon Martin supporters (Joe Raedle / Getty Images)
In a discussion of race and the George Zimmerman case on last night’s “O’Reilly Factor,” Fox News host Bill O’Reilly thought he’d come up with a revealing statistic. A resounding piece of data. A mind-blowing number. A jaw-dropping factoid.
The cable-news king was chatting with the Rev. Jacques DeGraff and citing the problem that “overwhelmingly violent crime in this country is generated by young black men. Am I wrong?” DeGraff took issue with the suggestion that somehow violent crime was in the DNA of young black men, noting that “certain conditions” and geography play a role in the problem.
Then O’Reilly unsheathed his data point:
O’REILLY: Well when — then how — if that’s your contention, Reverend, what do you — how do you react to this statistic? And this is unbelievable: In 2011, 91 percent of all black Americans who were murdered, 91 percent were murdered by other black Americans. I mean that — that cuts across every geographical boundary — 91 percent.
DeGraff responded that “most crimes are committed by people from the ethnic group of the perpetrator.”
And how! Have a look at this report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. From 1980 through 2008, 84 percent of white murder victims were killed by whites; 93 percent of black murder victims were killed by blacks. So just how unbelievable does O’Reilly’s statistic appear now?
As the discussion rolled on, O’Reilly bashed the media a bit: “There is no way on earth this trial should be getting this much coverage. And the only reason it’s doing it is because it’s a light-skinned Hispanic against a black kid.”
Funny thing: The Erik Wemple Blog seems to recall some recent “O’Reilly Factor” segments on the trial. This is one host who understands where his ratings are coming from.
...............................
love it---I saw it to and wanted to write it for my blog, but of course yours is excellent--I'll use yours if you don't mind.  
Not that long ago he tried to tell an African-American individual  Robert L. Johnson, founder of BET, that the reason some people in the the Black community had difficulty in the work place was because there was a performance issue and he had statistics for that, too.  
Keep in mind, this is someone who does not want the government to pay for any kind of sensitivity training for other cultures or any group of Americans.  Bill, wake-up, look around--this is America.  
He knows everything.  I called him an Ugly American and it seems like the title fits.   
A few years ago I was a school nurse at a 6th grade school with kids from Bario Logan.  The 12 year old boys were constantly beat up for gang affiliation.  Can you believe it.  I was shocked and I have lived in San Diego forever.  
Point being--would this happen to the kids in the white community--I don't think so.  Would this happen to Bill's kids at school.  Would he stand for it?  
What does the 12 year old kid do about it.  Many of the parents had low-income jobs, for instance,  at two taco shops, to meet expenses, no phone and were Spanish speaking.  
You notice Bill rarely has any one on he cannot run over, or in the case of Robert L. Johnson, he simply refused to take in the information, except for the time he had on Bill Clinton and he conducted himself in a completely different way.  Well, it's his show and I guess that's why people like Wesley Clarke would not go on it.  
Bill O'Reilly, the ugly American strikes again.....

here is Bill explaining the facts to Robert L.