Mar 14, 2016

Charles Krauthammer Tells O'Reilly He Is a Weasel for Defending Trump

On the Factor this evening Charles Krauthammer tells Bill O'Reilly he is a weasel for defending donald trump at his Chicago rally Friday night called off due to protester interruption.

Charles Krauthammer had to explain to Bill O'Reilly there were two separate issues:  first there was the protest by the left at odds with the views of trump and secondly, the larger issue of trump, an individual running for the highest office in our country, not condemning the fighting taking place in the crowd by his supporters.  Krauthammer was specifically talking about the man that sucker punched a protester who had made an inappropriate gesture and then said the next time we may have to kill him.

Charles Krauthammer had to explain the whole thing to Bill--twice and slowly.  Bill tried to say trump was in uncharted waters as he had never run for political office and that he should be excused for his lack of criticism for this kind of act.

Charles Krauthammer had to go into more detail of trump's repeated calls to punch someone in the face and recounting tales of protesters being taken out on a stretcher in days past.

Yes, on Fox News Charles Krauthammer spoke against the ideas and campaign of the donald.  Charles said the way he was acting was not right, not Presidential and not the kind of activity that should take place by someone running for this kind of position.  Charles said donald is making incorrect statements about violence and it has to stop.

As one watches the show one has to wonder if Bill O'Reilly condones this kind of behavior.  One wonders if trump is a racist and a bigot and bill follows in that philosophy, as well.


copied from salon.com:



UESDAY, MAR 15, 2016 05:32 AM PDT

Charles Krauthammer ridicules Bill O’Reilly for using “weaselly words” to defend Trump’s violent rhetoric

"Readjust his violent rhetoric?" Krauthammer asked, there's "No excuse" for not condemning it

  
TOPICS: DONALD TRUMP, BILL O'REILLY, CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER, THE O'REILLY FACTOR, VIDEO, FOX NEWS,ELECTIONS 2016, 2016 GOP PRIMARY, , , 
Charles Krauthammer ridicules Bill O'Reilly for using "weaselly words" to defend Trump's violent rhetoricBill O'Reilly, Charles Krauthammer (Credit: Fox News)
Charles Krauthammer was unimpressed, to say the least, by Bill O’Reilly’s defense of Trump’s violent rhetoric.
On Monday night’s edition of The O’Reilly Factor, Krauthammer opened by commenting on Sarah Palin’s condemnation of the “punk-ass thuggery” of far-left plants at Trump rallies, saying that “it’s refreshing to hear Sarah Palin — it’s that kind of calm, reasoned political rhetoric that we need in this country, and it’s so welcomed when we can hear it from her.”
O’Reilly chuckled, but his mirth was short-lived, as Krauthammer immediately turned on the GOP front-runner himself. “There are two separate phenomenon here,” by which he meant the organized “tactic of shutting the opposition down,” much like what — according to Krauthammer — happened “in the 1920s and 1930s,” and which is “happening on campuses all the time now, speakers who aren’t allowed to speak,” basically how “the left acts in a totalitarian way to control who speaks.”
Such a phenomenon should be condemned, he added, but that’s not what is happening at Trump events. The candidate himself is “winking and nodding and saying, ‘In the old days, we carried them out on a stretcher,'” suggesting in no uncertain terms that “‘We used to beat people like that until they weren’t able to walk.'”
“We saw a guy on that tape sucker-punching a demonstrator in the face, and saying, ‘If we see him again, we may have to kill him.'” When Trump was asked about it, he said “‘I don’t condone violence in the abstract,’ [and] that’s great, but he refused to condemn it, and that’s unconscionable. Are you letting Trump off the hook for this?” Krauthammer asked.
“I’m not,” O’Reilly shot back. “I’ve said he has to readjust his rhetoric.”
“Come on Bill!” Krauthammer replied. “‘Readjust the rhetoric‘? What kind of weaselly words are those? ‘Readjust the rhetoric‘?”
“I’m trying to deal with this in a fair and balanced way,” O’Reilly said, despite having spent the majority of the program having done nothing of the sort. “So I think we’re going to remove the word ‘weaselly’ from it.”
“I’m not going to rebut the point, I’m going to illuminate the point,” he continued. “Trump speaks in an emotional manner — he talks like this, ‘bang, bang, bang’ — and he doesn’t have a filter. He doesn’t think sometimes before he speaks, he doesn’t understand that his words can carry threats. But I’m not going to sit here and say he’s responsible for what happened in Chicago.”
O’Reilly added that Trump only failed to condemn his supporter because “he never admits a mistake,” a rationale that didn’t sit well with Krauthammer. “That’s no excuse,” he said, “no excuse. How difficult is it to condemn it and not say, ‘it’s obvious that that [who sucker-punched a protester] is a patriot.'”
Watch the entire segment via Fox News.
Scott Eric Kaufman
Scott Eric Kaufman is an assistant editor at Salon. He taught at a university, but then thought better of it. Follow him at @scottekaufman or email him atskaufman@salon.com.





Related articles

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Reporter who says she was manhandled by Trump campaign manager resigns from Breitbart: Wa Po on The Ronni Re

Reporter who says she was 

manhandled by Trump 

campaign manager resigns 

from Breitbart

   

The Trump campaign's controversy with Michelle Fields, explained

 
Play Video2:23
After reporter Michelle Fields was grabbed roughly on the campaign trail, controversy is brewing for Republican frontrunner Donald Trump, conservative news site Breitbart and the reporters involved. (Jenny Starrs/The Washington Post)
Breitbart News reporter Michelle Fields and editor-at-large Ben Shapiro have resigned from the conservative site over its handling of an alleged assault on Fields by Donald Trump’s campaign manager Corey Lewandowski.
“I don’t think they took my side,” Fields told The Washington Post early Monday. “They were protecting Trump more than me.”
Last week, Fields recounted in a post for Breitbart how Lewandowski allegedly grabbed her by the arm and yanked her away as she attempted to ask Trump a question after a news conference in Florida. The encounter left finger-shaped bruises on the 28-year-old reporter’s arm.
The Post’s Ben Terris, who witnessed the incident, has reported that Lewandowski was the one who grabbed Fields.
Trump and Lewandowski vehemently denied the accusation, and on Friday Breitbart — which has been sympathetic to Trump throughout the campaign — published a long post by senior editor at large Joel Pollak that painstakingly pieced together the event in question before concluding that the altercation couldn’t have happened the way Fields described it. Ultimately, Pollak suggested that perhaps Terris mistook Lewandowski for a security official or that her injuries were an accident incurred in the press scrum.
That same day, though, the site put out a brief statement saying that it stood behind Fields, but it did not demand an apology from the Trump campaign or assert that Fields was correct in identifying Lewandowski.
Pollak also reportedly instructed Breitbart staffers not to publicly defend their colleague. In internal messages originally obtained by BuzzFeed, a staffer, Brandon Darby, wrote that Lewandowski’s behavior was “a declaration of war” and that “silence is abandoning our team member.” Pollak responded, “In war, we wait for orders that are based on a careful plan. So wait.” (Speaking to The Post, Shapiro confirmed that the chat’s transcripts were accurate.)
“Breitbart has unfortunately become Trump’s Pravda,” Shapiro said, explaining his own resignation and referring to the Soviet Communist Party publication. “No media outlet worth its salt would throw over their own reporter and bad-mouth her on their front page in order to protect the candidate.”
Fields has stood by her account of the incident, as has Terris, even after Pollak published his piece challenging them both.
“I would have liked for them to believe me, believe the eyewitness,” Fields said of Breitbart. “I think they were more concerned about preserving their access to Trump than they were about finding out the truth.”
In an email to Politico, Breitbart editor in chief Alex Marlow denied Fields’s claim that the company didn’t plan to defend Fields or demand an apology.
“By 2:10am Wednesday, we had released a statement calling any physical contact ‘unacceptable’ and demanding an apology,” he wrote. “We have clearly expressed that the Trump campaign’s claims against the Breitbart News reporter contradict the evidence and that we stand with Michelle.”
Fields filed a report with the Jupiter, Fla., police department Friday, according to the Associated Press. That same day, she did an interview with Fox News’s Megyn Kelly explaining her decision. She said that she’d contacted her editor, Matthew Boyle, and told him what happened and said that Boyle contacted Lewandowski, who allegedly admitted to grabbing Fields.
“He did not deny it,” Fields said. “He said that he didn’t realize that I was a Breitbart reporter.”
Fields said she was told she would receive an apology, but one never came. Instead, on Thursday the campaign released a statement denying her allegations.
“They have basically done a character assassination on me,” she told Kelly.
In denying Fields’s allegations, Trump and Lewandowski have suggested that Fields was lying about the assault.
“Perhaps she made the story up; I think that’s what happened,” Trump told reporters at the CNN debate Thursday.
Lewandowski was less diplomatic.
In a statement released Thursday afternoon, Trump campaign spokeswoman Hope Hicks said: “The accusation, which has only been made in the media and never addressed directly with the campaign, is entirely false. As one of the dozens of individuals present as Mr. Trump exited the press conference I did not witness any encounter. In addition to our staff, which had no knowledge of said situation, not a single camera or reporter of more than 100 in attendance captured the alleged incident.”
Shapiro said that Breitbart is no longer the website he signed on to work for right after founder Andrew Breitbart’s death in 2012.
“The central mission was fighting bullies,” he said. But current Chairman Stephen Bannon “has perverted the mission into one of personal ego-driven politics.”
The exits of Shapiro and Fields follow that of Breitbart spokesman Kurt Bardella, who said Friday he would no longer work for the company because of its treatment of Fields.
“When you get to a point where you can’t 100 percent support the person you’re representing, the right thing to do is to step aside,” he told CNN.
“They’ve been looking for a reason to disprove something when all the evidence from a Washington Post reporter’s firsthand account, to the bruises on Michelle’s arm, to all the photos and video clips that we’ve seen strongly suggest that Corey Lewandowski, Donald Trump’s campaign manager, was the one who did this. And there’s no reason to never support your own reporter.”
“Are you saying they’re lying?” anchor Don Lemon interjected.
“Yes, I am,” Bardella responded.
Shapiro and Fields handed in their resignations late Sunday night. Shapiro said that he doesn’t expect theirs to be the last.
But more than anything else, she told The Post, Fields is worried by the Trump campaign’s continued denials of her account.
“What hurts me the most is the lying and smearing that the Trump campaign is doing,” she said. “… If they can do it to me, if they can lie about a conservative reporter, who knows what they’ll be able to do when they have power of the executive branch?”
Here’s the full text of Shapiro’s and Fields’s resignation statements.
From Shapiro:
As a close personal friend and mentee of Andrew Breitbart’s, it saddens me tremendously to announce that as of 9:00 p.m. Pacific Time, I have resigned from Breitbart News as editor-at-large. I met Andrew Breitbart when I was seventeen years old and remained his friend until his tragic death; I signed on with Breitbart News two weeks before Andrew’s death because I believed in his mission.
I am proud of what we accomplished in the years following his death, fighting back against the leftist media and debunking the left’s key narratives. I have many good friends at Breitbart News, including editor-in-chief Alex Marlow and editor-at-large John Nolte, and I admire CEO Larry Solov for his dedication to ensuring a financial future for Andrew’s widow, Susie, and his four children.
Andrew built his life and his career on one mission: fight the bullies. But Andrew’s life mission has been betrayed. Indeed, Breitbart News, under the chairmanship of Steve Bannon, has put a stake through the heart of Andrew’s legacy. In my opinion, Steve Bannon is a bully, and has sold out Andrew’s mission in order to back another bully, Donald Trump; he has shaped the company into Trump’s personal Pravda, to the extent that he abandoned and undercut his own reporter, Breitbart News’ Michelle Fields, in order to protect Trump’s bully campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, who allegedly assaulted Michelle. I spoke with Michelle the night after the incident. She told me her story. That story was backed by audiotape, eyewitness testimony from The Washington Post’s Ben Terris, physical bruises, and video tape.
Both Lewandowski and Trump maligned Michelle in the most repulsive fashion. Meanwhile, Breitbart News not only stood by and did nothing outside of tepidly asking for an apology, they then attempted to abandon Michelle by silencing staff from tweeting or talking about the issue. Finally, in the ultimate indignity, they undermined Michelle completely by running a poorly-evidenced conspiracy theory as their lead story in which Michelle and Terris had somehow misidentified Lewandowski.
This is disgusting. Andrew never would have stood for it. No news outlet would stand for it.
Nobody should.
This truly breaks my heart. But, as I am fond of saying, facts don’t care about your feelings, and the facts are undeniable: Breitbart News has become precisely the reverse of what Andrew would have wanted. Steve Bannon and those who follow his lead should be ashamed of themselves.
From Fields:
Today I informed the management at Breitbart News of my immediate resignation. I do not believe Breitbart News has adequately stood by me during the events of the past week and because of that I believe it is now best for us to part ways.
Sarah Kaplan is a reporter for Morning Mix.



copied from The Washington Post

and here is a link to the page:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/03/14/reporter-who-says-she-was-manhandled-by-trump-campaign-manager-resigns-from-breitbart/

Related articles

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Mar 13, 2016

Pitbulls for Peace Endorsing John Kasich

Ronnie--willing to go to the dog beach with Kasich
Two Pitbulls, one white, another mostly black,...
Two Pitbulls, one white, another mostly black, 'tuxedo-black'. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Dog beach at Coronado, California.
Dog beach at Coronado, California. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
English: "Arroz con pollo" and "...
English: "Arroz con pollo" and "papa a la huancaína". Home-made. Lima, Perú. Español: Arroz con pollo y papa a la huancaína. Preparación casera. Lima, Perú. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Seriously, folks, this donald trump figure is an embarrassment to our country.

As John Kasich said to John Dickerson on CBS Face The nation this morning we can't have pictures going around the world of individuals slugging it out at a campaign rally.

It's poor judgment and it looks dumb.

I could not go down to the dog park and act that way or I would be asked to leave and possibly not be able to come back.

There may be a hold up on the chicken and rice when I get home and I am just not willing to risk that.

Where's the judgment--donald trump has poor judgment.

At the end of the day we have to leave donald trump home--we can't take him out--he has no manners.


Ronnie:  donald has just got to stop and take a few moments to get things together before he acts--we all have to.


...........................................


The other evening John Kasich said we are getting all kinds of endorsements.

Does he mean Cats for Kasich?


Ohio Cats for Kasich:  Bams did not really take offense at the kitchen comment as he enjoys food and working with the appliances





Related articles

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Mar 12, 2016

The McLaughlin Group 3/11/16: As Usual, Elanor Always Has To School The Group

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)