SUZE ORMAN AND HER STUPID BLUE JACKET

Suze Orman And Her Stupid Jacket.......

Lady, you're out of line and out of touch......if your financial sense is anything like your fashion sense I think you've got some work to do.

Is that jacket a need or a want?

my love hate relationship with suze orman.......

heck, I wish I was suzy orman...minus that jacket

The jacket is stunning but stupid....appearing on CBS Sunday Morning today in a ridiculous blinding bright blue leather jacket, in the middle of summer; and expecting me to listen to her pound on about using good judgement....cute but ridiculous.

You’re not going to talk to me about spending my money with that jacket on.....carefully watching every cent....Do I really need it, or do I just "want" it.....can I actually afford it?

No one in the world “needs” that jacket.

How dare Suze Orman go on television and shout at me about what to spend, where and when--need versus want--and stand there in that stupid blue jacket.

Suze--did you really need a bright blue jacket?

is that practical?

How many outfits can you wear that thing with--are all of your outfits neutral and that is your only color--blinding bright blue?

I don’t care how rich and successful you are.....you are out of line.

And don't try to tell me you can afford it because you cannot expect anyone to take you seriously on any subject, particularly money, while you're ranting on about need versus want in iridescent blue motorcycle regalia during a heat wave.

It just doesn't work for me--it's a fashion and financial faux pas.

Besides all of that--I don’t want to hear Suze spout off again about holding her spending and holding her dollars until she can get some input from single moms--you get some info out there about the cost of cheer leading, lady, and then you can talk.

Yes, I do admire suze--she is far more successful than I am--well, anybody is....but please, you are way out of touch.

Yes, your idea is basically good, but to quote you, you are not practical--that holier than thou theory just does not work with kids, being tired, stupid ex-husbands and always being overworked...exhausted and angry...and pissed off at the facility.  Oh right, and not to mention the other kids with their big ideas....and don’t forget cooking a healthy meal...sitting down to dinner together without television and other fantasies.

Oh, I wish I could be as smart and full of good judgement as suze....

No, I am not talking about the gay or straight thing...

I’m talking about time and being tired and trying to make the right decision about raising children, working, biding your time......and making good financial decisions.

Lady--get some more info--from real people--take that f+++ing jacket off, you don’t need, and then you can talk.

from the 100 dollar old school oak writing desk of chloe louise...I don’t really need this big desk but I do like it.

talking about suze and her latest rant on cbs sunday morning......

(my rant back...oh, mom, are you on one of your rants again......)

I guess she forgot about her “one pair of gold earrings she’s had for 20 years” when she bought that jacket. She could have bought more earrings--oh, I certainly could afford them, but I just don't need them so I keep wearing the same pair. Perhaps a style consultant would have been a frugal investment?

cl

Self-righteousness (also called sanctimoniousness, sententiousness, and holier-than-thou attitudes[1]) is a feeling or display of (usually smug) moral superiority[2] derived from a sense that one's beliefs, actions, or affiliations are of greater virtue than those of the average person......from wiki...cl

Henry Winkler to CNN's George Strombo: I Really Don't Care For My Parents

If Fonzie can say it I can say it, too.

Henry Winkler Talks Parenting on George Strombo's New CNN Show

TV Friday: CNN raises the curtain on Strombo’s new show — again

Stroumboulopoulos promises lively, smart talk on host's own terms

On his CNN show, George Stroumboulopoulos decides whom he talks to, for how long, and what they can talk about.PHOTO: CBC

Henry Winkler on the new show of CNN.......I'm just calling it the George Strombo show......

Well, it was real good and Henry Winkler was particularly good, interesting and informative.  He does not really care for his parents.  While this news may hurt some people's feelings it was music to my ears.  

Right, to me, enough people do not talk about this kind of thing....

You are a kid, you know something is wrong, you have food and some clothes, but life is so confusing you can't get on with it.....

That's right, you're stifled, stopped, what's going on, I can't stand it.....it leads to a life of total confusion...do you know how many people told me, when I was a kid.....you need to have more self-confidence?  After a while I just said yes; really, I had no clue what they were talking about, I finally started agreeing to get on with it and get away from the stupid adult without arguing and getting in trouble....

You can't say you do not like your parents to most people.........

It's against the Bible....

I finally learned that.  I kept trying to talk about it and no one wanted to listen.  Because most people do love their parents even though they may have made a few mistakes.  They think you are unnatural, an oddity, mentally ill.....but in my case it didn't help that mother kept going behind my back and telling everyone I was mentally ill...mentally ill and dirty.  

I'm embarrassed to write this...

Enough about me, but thank you to Henry Winkler and George.

Good job to George, Henry and CNN.

here is some more things about Henry and I copied it from Imdb...

I love being a parent. (April 2007)

There is a gigantic learning curve for parents, knowing when to shut up. My son Max says to me, "Every time you talk to my friends, there has to be a life lesson. Can't you just say hello?"

I was 31 when I realised I wasn't stupid. Dyslexia was diagnosed in me, along with my stepson Jed and, as it turns out, in all our children. They've had the same confidence issues I had. You can't protect them from that, but what you can do is tell them they're fantastic 15 times a day.

American movies have destroyed people's ability to relate. If a guy puts his head on your stomach, soon enough that head will feel so heavy, it hurts. The reality is that relationships are hard work with tremendous highs and desperate lows, incredible battles and moments of wonder and admiration. You have to take the whole package.

I've been married to Stacey Winkler for 30 years. The key to an enduring relationship is in the ear, not the heart or mind. How you think or feel about what you are saying is not what is important. What matters is how they hear it. After 30 years, there is only one reason to stay together - because you really want to.

The Fonz was the Yin to my Yang. He was everything I wanted to be because there was nothing cool about me growing up. I became good looking when I was 28, when Happy Days started. Suddenly girls were knocking on my hotel door. Being chased was wonderful with a capital W. Holy mackerel, yes! I was happy to take advantage of that for a couple of years.

I could never hang on to girlfriends. I was funny, but too intense. I wrote one girl 150 love letters, all of them misspelt, and waited like a puppy outside her classroom door. Turned out she was seeing someone else all along.

I learnt to have a sense of humour. As an undiagnosed dyslexic, you spend a third of your time trying to figure out what's wrong with you, a third of your time trying to figure out why you can't figure it out and the final third trying to cover up the shame and humiliation.

I vowed two things as a boy. The first was that I would be an actor, the second that I would never be like my parents. My father spoke 11 languages, my mother had no problem spelling. Their nickname for me was dummer hund - dumb dog, said often enough for it not to be funny. The idea that a child should be seen and not heard is arcane and barbaric.

My one word with which to live life would have to be tenacity. My parents were Jews who fled Nazi Germany in 1939. I learnt tenacity from them when what I needed was their pride.

here is a link to that page on Imdb:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001857/bio

George Stroumboulopoulos goes fearlessly — again — where many have gone before, but few have succeeded. Friday marks the official debut of Strombo’s new CNN interview programStroumboulopoulos, following a sneak preview last weekend. The preview did not reel in as many viewers as CNN and Strombo would have liked, but Friday is its regular day and time, and it’s on Fridays numbers the show will be judged.

Stroumboulopoulos follows in the trail of other talk shows, including a short-lived weekend program hosted by standup comedian and occasional political commentator D.L. Hughley, that landed a spot on CNN’s prime-time schedule but didn’t stay the course.

Stroumboulopoulos is part summer replacement program and part summer job for Strombo, who told a Toronto sports-radio station last week that he’ll resume his duties with CBC at the summer’s end. CBC’s George Stroumboulopoulos Tonight isn’t going away any time soon, in other words. It’s simply taking a summer break.

the info about the new George copied from:

http://o.canada.com/2013/06/14/tv-friday-cnn-raises-the-curtain-on-strombos-new-talk-show/

talking about good moms........

Of course, I am writing this while I'm watching my favorite CNN show of all time, Fred Whitfield and her legal boys, Richard and Avery....do you see how Fred treats those boys....

She makes them feel like a million dollars and they feel so happy and accomplished...they are ready to go out and face the world with confidence...

Good job Fred...you're a good mom.

why I want to divorce my mother and marry my cat:

http://theronnierepublic.blogspot.com/2013/02/why-i-want-to-divorce-my-mother-and.html

cl

People-Art-Jagger

Some people, at a certain time and place in their life--they are the art--defining a particular fashion period, generation and style--the mood and attitude of the generation.  Who would you put in that category......  I'm saying Audrey Hepburn, Marlon Brando, Elizabeth Taylor, Mick Jagger, David Bowie...

copied from the Palestine Chronicle  by cl...........

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 Last Update: 2:34 PM GMT

Doc Jazz: a Palestinian Surgeon’s Musical Intifada

Apr 1 2013 / 6:44 pm

8

By Sahar Mansour

Times change, situations change, people change. This is how the world has always been, and this can definitely be said about these turbulent first decades of this 21st century. For this reason, it’s nice to know that there are also things and people that seem to be weathering these changes, and stubbornly remain there as constant and dependable factors.

In the limited world of music for the Palestinian cause, the phenomenon known as ‘Doc Jazz‘ can certainly be counted as one of these dependable factors. Almost since the very beginning of internet activism, he has been present and active, which is why to most people who are interested in the Palestinian cause, he would barely be in need of any introduction. He is the Palestinian surgeon who, next to his ongoing career as a surgeon, has been engaging in activism on and off the internet, with his music, his writings, his organizing skills at demonstrations and inspiring speeches, and his unstoppable energy.

These aspects of Tariq Shadid have indeed remained unchanged, but be careful not to mistake this constancy for lack of evolution and development. Those who remember him from his first songs for the Palestinian cause and have not checked back since, will probably be unaware how the quality of his musical recordings has been evolving constantly, now resulting in high-fidelity songs of a high quality, and with rich arrangements. His musical repertoire – at least those songs of his that are available online – has now reached 100 songs, most of which deal with almost all aspects of the Palestinian cause. There is barely an aspect of the struggle that is not represented in one of his songs. Best of all is: he does the entire production by himself, writes the songs and the lyrics, plays all the instruments, and does all the vocals.

His most recent album is ‘Intifada’, which was released in November 2012, and which features a selection of his most popular Palestine-songs, like Intifada, Right of Return, We Resist (Free Palestine) and Freedom Flotilla, as well as two of his Arabic songs for the cause. In the beginning of this year, he also came out with the song ‘Hungry’, dedicated to the cause of Samer Issawi and the other Palestinian political prisoners who protest against their detention by their unimaginably long hunger strikes. The song was well-received, and was featured on Dubai TV in a special about the Palestinian hunger strikers.

He has also recently joined the Free Samer Issawi Campaign, and has contributed to keeping the ongoing Twitter campaigns for that cause alive. Every day, at the same time, so-called ‘Twitterstorms’ are organized, which are joined by hundreds of dedicated tweeters, and rarely fail to get the daily hashtag to trend on the Worldwide list. On his website, all these world trending hashtags are collected, together with information on how to contribute to trending on Twitter effectively.

Another aspect that underlines the continuous evolution and expansion of his musical and activist project, the ‘Musical Intifada’, is his impressive following on Facebook. His Doc Jazz fan page there now boasts an impressive 31,000 members, a sign that his work is steadily increasing in scope and exposure. Having a quick and superficial listen to his music may not immediately explain why, and the reason for that is its almost incredible variety of musical styles. If you have listened to one of Doc Jazz’s songs, don’t assume that you already know the drill. The sound and style is not exactly what you will find in the entertainment world’s Top 40, so if that is what you are looking for, you may end up with a prejudiced judgment. This is a more sophisticated type of music that requires you to take time and really listen, but if you do, you are very likely to be captivated. You will encounter hip-hop, rock, funky jazz-pop, piano ballads, Palestinian folkloric music and modern Arabic music, and this description still doesn’t cover everything you can find in his impressive repertoire.

What perhaps best illustrates this, is the statement of recognition that was recently presented to Doc Jazz by the Edward Said National Conservatory in Palestine, for publication on his website. It reads:

“The Edward Said National Conservatory recognizes the musical work of Dr. Tariq Shadid, who goes by the name of Doc Jazz, as an important contribution to Palestinian music. We are impressed by the magnitude of his oeuvre and the richness of his compositions, wherein he manages to combine a wide variety of musical styles with a message that expresses the hopes and aspirations of our people. We appreciate the fact that he embraces modern musical trends just as much as his efforts to conserve the folkloric traditions of Palestinian music. We believe that his work can serve as an inspiration to aspiring young Palestinian musicians to develop their own efforts at musical composition and creativity.”

Indeed, that sums it up quite beautifully. Imagine if this was all we had to say about Dr. Tariq Shadid, wouldn’t that already be quite something? Well, to be truthful, it doesn’t end here.

Tariq Shadid has been writing for the Palestine Chronicle for well over a decade, and many of his writings can be found there, as well as on his website. A selection of his writings from before 2007 has also been published into a paperback called ‘Understanding Palestine’, which is available on Amazon. His articles mostly have one thing in common: they call for Palestinian self-determination, and they mobilize against normalization, and against racism. This is probably why his pieces are read and shared so widely: even though they may refer to current events happening at the time they were written, they are almost invariably characterized by timelessness, and contain truths that are applicable to the entire history of the Palestinian struggle.

Besides being an excellent musician and writer, this incredible allrounder also has a very artistic hand at drawing and painting. He painted the cover of his album ‘Front Door Key’, of a small Palestinian girl holding a key that symbolizes the return of Palestinian refugees to their homes, and recently drew a portrait of Samer Issawi that can now be found on websites and social media all over the world.

It’s hard to imagine that someone who is not only a full-time surgeon, but even the Head of Department of Surgery at his hospital, is able to do all these things and excel at all of them. However, if you realize that he is a Palestinian, you will undoubtedly conclude that it is that legendary Palestinian drive and dedication that forms this basis of excellence. Those who are willing to look around, will never fail to see the amazing talents that the Palestinian people – both inside of Palestine and in the diaspora – are able to present to the world.

No one lives forever, but it has become obvious that as long as Tariq Shadid can breathe, sing, write and operate, he will not change who he is, and what he stands for. In this ever-changing and evolving world, this one-man production machine of Palestinian activism will remain a force to be reckoned with. The world emphasizes and celebrates the talents of Jews – even when it comes to the Palestinian cause, as if there aren’t any Palestinians available to represent themselves – but this is only because they are not willing to see the amazingly talented icons of the Palestinian people. They are there, they are impressive, and they will be seen and overwhelm the world.

- Sahar Mansour, originally from Jenin in Palestine, was born and raised in Belgium. She is studying English Literature at the University of Ghent. She contributed this article to PalestineChronicle.com.

Related posts:

1. South African Musical Solidarity for Palestine: The Mavrix
2. A Third Palestinian Intifada in the Making
3. Tariq Shadid: Palestinian Group DAM – Music Review
4. Tariq Shadid: Third Oslo or Fourth Intifada?
5. Gilad Atzmon: Jazz and Resistance Unite for Palestine

Hey Mick Jagger, I Want That Jacket

Right, I really want this jacket.......this was copied from crazymamablogspot.com....
here is the link....this website has some very good pictures of the Rolling Stones...
http://wwwcrazymama.blogspot.com/2013/06/rolling-stones-give-toronto-surprise-by.html

AFTERMATH.(All about The Stones Universe.)

Rolling with the Stones since 1976.

viernes, 7 de junio de 2013

Rolling Stones give Toronto a surprise by performing 'Worried About You'...

Rolling Stones give Toronto a surprise by performing 'Worried About You'

AEG Live is the promoter of the Rolling Stones' 2013 tour, which features former Rolling Stones guitarist Mick Taylor as a guest on all the tour dates. The tour has been named "50 and Counting" as a celebration of the Rolling Stones' 50th anniversary.
At the June 6 concert in Toronto, the Rolling Stones skipped performing "Happy," which has guitarist Richards on lead vocals. "Happy" has been a mainstay at most Rolling Stones concerts since the song came out in 1972. The Stones skipped playing the song at their Chicago concert on May 28, 2013, their Los Angeles concert on May 20, 2013 and their Chicago concert on June 3, 2013. Richards has been singing "You Got the Silver" at concerts where "Happy" is not part of the set list. In addition to "Happy," the other song that Richards has been consistently singing lead vocals on for the 2013 tour is "Before They Make Me Run."
As of May 8, 2013, select concerts on the tour will feature a song performed by request from fans who voted online via the official Rolling Stones mobile app. For each concert, fans will be given a choice of five different songs to vote for, and the Rolling Stones will perform the song that gets the most votes for that concert. The Rolling Stones also did this for their "50 and Counting" concerts in 2012. At the concert on June 6, 2103, the song performed by request was "Worried About You."

I Would Like To Publicly Thank Larry Hancock.....

I would like to publicly thank Larry Hancock for taking the time to respond to my comment on his website having to do with his post Whispers.....

Well, obviously not only is he a brilliant JFK Assassination researcher but he is also kind and gracious.  No wonder he is so well-respected in the field.  His post was so inspirational to me I really went off on what my kids would call my own rant.  I could not stop thinking in the night--I must make some sort of new comment and include an apology.

Well, instead, as everyone can see Larry went on not only to respond with important information about the upcoming JFK Assassination Conference put on by Lancer every November in Dallas,  but he took time to answer my comment in a way that was very in depth, interesting and informational.  

Wow, Larry....I really want to go on your tour this November in Dallas....thank you for your kindness and your good information.

I’m just hoping you do not connect my post to me as a participant on the tour.......

Respectfully,

chloe louise,

and here is my comment with some spelling corrections.......

chloelouiselangendorflouis says:

June 4, 2013 at 9:54 pm

Dear Larry–I love your work and I like to post it on my blog–The Ronnie Republic and I have been following you for a long time. I have two very important things to say…First and foremost…what do you suggest for the average JFK buff on attending Dallas in November. I previously read about a Dealy Plaza Tour on Sunday and I think it was by Lancer. What do you suggest one does to join in on the interesting things that will be taking place in Dallas this November. I would love to hear you speak. Looking forward to your suggestions…

Second, and this is only a comment….reading further on your post provided by the link. I really enjoyed reading this info by Mr. Bradford but it started reminding me of the time I read in Vanity Fair ages ago about the Chappaquiddick incident of Teddy Kennedy. Of course it was an accident, but instead of just going to the police and going on with it, the Kennedys did everything they could do to make the thing proper in light of their public office and the whole thing turned into a big mess. Instead of fixing it up as they set out to do it just became more complicated and grounds for ridicule. This is the problem I have with Bobby Kennedy.

Now I feel like there are about 4 major problems with info on the JFK incident. First, I think it was all on a need to know basis, and involved seedy individuals which would include mob and CIA. Those people are never going to talk and even within those groups there are probably many who suspect most of the facts but there is not and never will be any certainty. The problem with that is, and I hate to say it, but if there is never a solid 30 second take away for the American public of who actually pulled the trigger and why, the whole thing is never going to fly….especially now because I think that most people cannot take time to be bothered to understand this highly complicated story.

Once I read and saw the movie, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, I realized there are way too many Roddy Martindales out there. The info is like stocks and stars in the sky. It is right there but we are never going to be able to see it clearly because there is so much counter information or obfuscation to go along with it. Thirdly–think about it–with members of the Kennedy family living and active in political society–what is the government going to say–oh, we accidentally killed your family member or allowed it to happen. I just don’t think the people in charge are going to let those facts come to light in a clear fashion that everyone can understand. The last thing–once we start finding out all of this information there is always plenty of real unflattering info about the Kennedys themselves, everything from Mary Meyer, many other women, the health of John Kennedy, the arrogance of the family, particularly the dad and Jack and Bobby. Really, I want to know the answer–I saw Oswald shot trying to watch cartoons that morning 50 years ago–but I think the whole thing is just too much. When I start hearing some of these facts that are so seedy--its like I just can’t take anymore and have to move on to another subject.

Well, what do you think? Seriously, your book and your ability as a speaker is one of the best approaches because there is a certain subtlety to it that can be more tolerated and believed and accepted. And that’s the other thing–once all the arguing starts among the researchers the listeners shut their ears, their eyes glaze over and everything is lost. I hate to say all of this because I have been following it forever–my family teases me–but I am beginning to have my doubts. And I don’t intend any of this in a mean way–I actually mean it all as a compliment by an interested observer who has been following this info forever. I really think The Men Who Killed Kennedy is one of the best things out there because its understandable and it tells a somewhat reasonable story.

Thank you for your time and letting me speak–I really appreciate it and I appreciate your work. I appreciate the work of all the researchers. cl

here is a link to that page on the website of Larry Hancock:

http://larryhancock.wordpress.com/2013/06/01/whispers/

Larry Hancock Talks About November In Dallas

Larry Hancock talks about the Lancer Conference this November in Dallas, Texas.......

On the next point, actually I do think there is a solid 30 second take away and even a sound byte – “Senior CIA officers let certain keIn regard to Dallas, the JFK Lancer conference will be a key vehicle not only to connect with a great number of the most experienced researchers on the case but to have a considerable amount of personal time with them. In addition to four days of presentations (the schedule runs from 8 am to 9 pm each day) a number of focus group sessions where you have the chance to engage in a small group discussion on various topics. For myself I will be moderating focus groups on the cover up and on the Cuban exile aspect of the conspiracy. If you have not been in Dallas before, there will be separate tours that you could take, lead by a real expert on not only Dallas but the physical and people aspects of Nov. 22, 1963 – Jerry Dealey will be leading those tours and he is a Dallas historical docent plus one of the major gurus on both physical nature of the plaza and of tLarryhe TSBD. In addition to that both Jerry and I will be leading walking tours of the plaza area on Sunday.

In regard to your other points, it is pretty obvious that for various reasons the Kennedy family chose not to engage in the investigation, at least publicly, and their control of various pieces of evidence has been a serious hindrance – as a co

June 5, 2013 at 1:17 pm

Larry Hancock

Larry Hancock is a leading historian-researcher in the JFK assassination. Co-author with Connie Kritzberg of November Patriots and author of the 2003 research analysis publication titled also Someone Would Have Talked. In addition, Hancock has published several document collections addressing the 112th Army Intelligence Group, John Martino, and Richard Case Nagell. In 2000, Hancock received the prestigious Mary Ferrell New Frontier Award for the contribution of new evidence in the Kennedy assassination case. In 2001, he was also awarded the Mary Ferrell Legacy Award for his contributions of documents released under the JFK Act.First thank you for the re-posting and for your kind remarks…both are much app

Larry Hancockreciated!!unter, there is some reason to believe that Bobby specifically may have held certain information and even material in the hope of becoming president and moving into a position to order a true investigation. That was never going to happen withFirst thank you for the re-posting and for your kind remarks…both are much appreciated!! Johnson in power, for reasons I discuss in SWHT. So, from my perspective, the whole Kennedy family track is simply something to set aside – the fact that we have a document showing Bobby actually signing for a full autopsy nIn regard to Dallas, the JFK Lancer conference will be a key vehicle not only to connect with a great number of the most experienced researchers on the case but to have a considerable amount of personal time with them. In addition to four days of presentations (the schedule runs from 8 am to 9 pm each day) a number of focus group sessions where you have the chance to engage in a small group discussion on various topics. For myself I will be moderating focus groups on the cover up and on the Cuban exile aspect of the conspiracy. If you have not been in Dallas before, there will be separate tours that you could take, lead by a real expert on not only Dallas but the physical and people aspects of Nov. 22, 1963 – Jerry Dealey will be leading those tours and he is a Dallas historical docent plus one of the major gurus on both physical nature of the plaza and of the TSBD. In addition to that both Jerry and I will be leading walking tours of the plaza area on Sunday.egates a lot of speculation. Bottom line, the family could have done a lot more but then that could be said of a lot of people in positions of political power who knew there was a lot more to the story than a lone nut.y individuals involved in thIn regard to your other points, it is pretty obvious that for various reasons the Kennedy family chose not to engage in the investigation, at least publicly, and their control of various pieces of evidence has been a serious hindrance – as a counter, there is some reason to believe that Bobby specifically may have held certain information and even material in the hope of becoming president and moving into a position to order a true investigation. That was never going to happen with Johnson in power, for reasons I discuss in SWHT. So, from my perspective, the whole Kennedy family track is simply something to set aside – the fact that we have a document showing Bobby actually signing for a full autopsy negates a lot of speculation. Bottom line, the family could have done a lot more but then that could be said of a lot of people in positions of political power who knew there was a lot more to the story than a lone nut.e anti Castro effort know that JFK was entering into negotiations with Castro about taking Cuba neutral, those officers passed the information to extremely militant Cuban exiles who were already trying to kill Castro along with the message that JFK was a national security threat and a traitor to the Cuban exile cause…the result was the attack in Dallas.” The attack had three goals, revenge on JFK for the Bay of Pigs, elimination of him as a threat to a revolution against Castro and thirdly a plan to frame Castro for the attack. The first two elements worked, the third aborted when Oswald was taken into custody. Now that’s easy for me to say, but it takes over 400 pages in SWHT aOn the next point, actually I do think there is a solid 30 second take away and even a sound byte – “Senior CIA officers let certain key individuals involved in the anti Castro effort know that JFK was entering into negotiations with Castro about taking Cuba neutral, those officers passed the information to extremely militant Cuban exiles who were already trying to kill Castro along with the message that JFK was a national security threat and a traitor to the Cuban exile cause…the result was the attack in Dallas.” The attack had three goals, revenge on JFK for the Bay of Pigs, elimination of him as a threat to a revolution against Castro and thirdly a plan to frame Castro for the attack. The first two elements worked, the third aborted when Oswald was taken into custody. Now that’s easy for me to say, but it takes over 400 pages in SWHT and another couple of hundred in NEXUS to present the case for that conclusion.nd another couple of hundred in NEXUS to present the case for that conclusion.

Bottom line, will we ever know all tactical details of the Dallas attack, the answer is not with any total certainty – although a bit more of that may come clear this November. Will we know why JFK was killed and generally who was behind it, the answer is that I believe we do but its a matter of circumstantial evidence and sources. Could you win a criminal trial, probably not, a civil trial, most likBottom line, will we ever know all tactical details of the Dallas attack, the answer is not with any total certainty – although a bit more of that may come clear this November. Will we know why JFK was killed and generally who was behind it, the answer is that I believe we do but its a matter of circumstantial evidence and sources. Could you win a criminal trial, probably not, a civil trial, most likely. And in terms of the cover up, we could absolutely present sufficient evidence of that as well as perjury and obfuscation to convince any group of 12 random individuals.ely. And in terms of the cover up, we could absolutely present sufficient evidence of that as well as perjury and obfuscation to convince any group of 12 random individuals.

LoLong winded answer but I hope it helps, we can go further if you wish. Best regards, Larryng win


L


ded answer but I hope it helps, we can go further if you wish. Best regards, Larry

Mermaid Street, Rye

file under my London obsession..........

would this be a good day trip from London.....cl

This is GREAT Britain

3:08 AM

A glorious image of Mermaid Street in the historic East Sussex town of Rye

copied from the website of Google UK   by cl......

Whispers--from the Website of JFK Assassination Expert Larry Hancock

copied from the website of Larry Hancock........

New post on Larry Hancock Whispers by Larry Hancock I wanted to share an very informative article just prepared for posting by my friend Rex Bradford.  The article is taken from a presentation Rex gave at a Lancer conference in 2008 and is the sort of overview work that we truly to see brought forth for the 50th anniversary of the Kennedy assassination.  I should note that Rex is doing the same sort of overview for this November's conference, focusing on the period following the assassination. He will address the obfuscation which occurred during what was supposed to be an open investigation of the murder - but which we now know was something a good bit different. Rex's piece, just published online, deals with remarks and insights from those individuals who know or felt there was something more to the assassination than you would find in the Warren Commission report. Overall it gives a quite chilling view of what people did not want to face up to, including people in a position to have some very legitimate concerns. It definitely should be shared with as many people as possible as we move forward to November. Whispers from A Silent Generation,  Rex Bradford http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Essay_-_Whispers_from_the_Silent_Generation -- Larry Larry Hancock | June 1, 2013 at 8:46 pm | Categories: Everything else | URL: http://wp.me/s1DeOb-whispers Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://larryhancock.wordpress.com/2013/06/01/whispers/

Thanks for flying with  WordPress.com